• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Pneuma Solutions

Accessible Cloud Technologies

  • EnglishEnglish
    • DeutschDeutsch
    • EspañolEspañol
    • FrançaisFrançais
    • ItalianoItaliano
    • PortuguêsPortuguês
    • SvenskaSvenska
  • Home
  • Login to Pneuma Solutions Services
    • Remote Incident Manager
    • Scribe for Documents
    • Scribe for Meetings
    • Sero
  • About
  • Products
    • All Products
    • Remote Incident Manager (RIM)
    • Scribe
    • Scribe For Meetings
    • Scribe for Meetings Self-Advocacy Kit
    • Scribe California Services
    • DocuScan Plus
    • Sero
  • FAQs
    • FAQ – Remote Incident Manager (RIM)
    • FAQ – Scribe
    • FAQ – Scribe For Meetings
    • FAQ – DocuScan Plus
    • FAQ – Sign-Up and Account Information
    • FAQ – Sales and Support
    • FAQ – System Access
    • FAQ – Sero
  • Jobs
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Contact Form
    • Subscribe to Our Email List
    • Terms of Use Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
Home > Pneuma Solutions Blog > Response to the Recent WSJ Independent Street Blog Article and its Comments

Response to the Recent WSJ Independent Street Blog Article and its Comments

Mike Calvo • January 18, 2008

On January 11, 2008, Wall Street Journal blogger Wendy Bounds posted a relatively innocuous article mentioning the accessibility lawsuit against Target Corporation and offering a little information about making a web site accessible. More interesting and alarming were the blog comments that followed. Several responders made comments about how terrible it was that the government would mandate accessibility and that people would sue those companies that are not ADA compliant. Worse were comments from ignorance about blind people not being interested in a lot of stuff on the Web and snide remarks about the writer being in trouble if his blog comment was read by a blind lawyer. It is painful to see that we still face this type of discrimination in the United States and that people still argue in favor of their right to discriminate.

When the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) took effect in 1992, we in the blind community knew that enforcement would be a one lawsuit at a time experience. And that has proven to be the case. What can we say today? Accessibility is certainly improved over the situation in 1992, but blind and low-vision people are still at a considerable disadvantage in accessing many web sites. There is still much work to be done. That’s why Serotek made C-SAW available – so that our community could help each other by improving Web site accessibility. But there is really no excuse for web site owners and designers not to make their sites accessible.

We need to set the record straight concerning what we blind and low-vision people are interested in. The answer is everything and anything. If it is information, someone in our community wants it and is entitled to it – whether for his or her own use or to share with a loved one. That includes descriptions of primarily graphic sites, and it includes play-by-play and other descriptions of sports action. From abstract art to Australian football to Sponge Bob Square Pants to – you name it. There are interested blind and low-vision people. And that’s because we are people – just ordinary people. We have our own eclectic interests, and we have friends and families whose interests we also like to share. (From the comments by some of the WSJ blog readers you would think we were some lower life form, only interested in how many pencils we can put in the tin cup and in finding a dry place on the sidewalk to sit with our pet ACLU lawyer.)

The fact is, when the ADA passed, accessibility was a real technical challenge. Today it is not. Advanced accessibility tools like System Access to Go are readily available. The technology of accessibility in Web design is very robust. Anyone who chooses to make a small effort can deliver a highly accessible Web site. There are no excuses for not being accessible except, perhaps, that our community has still not persuaded the marketplace that even this small effort will be rewarded with increased sales.

All of us in the blind community have fought this battle against discrimination our whole lives. It gets old. It is discouraging to find readers of one of the country’s most prestigious newspapers spouting the same old clichés, steeped in ignorance and proud of their prejudice. But the only effective weapon against ignorance and prejudice is information. And only you and I have the interest and the ability to make the case for accessibility as a fundamental human right. If we want the world to change, we have to change it. The arguments against compliance with the ADA are no longer valid (if they ever were). The technology to be accessible is available to all. The cost of accessibility is negligible. The pay-off from being accessible is potentially large. We need to make that case again and again, as often as we can, wherever and whenever we can. There is no valid excuse for not being accessible, and accessibility is a fundamental human right. More than that, accessibility for everyone is morally right.

Share this:

Filed Under: Serotek News

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    February 9, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    Hey Mike and others reading this. I too read that WSJ post and its comments when it was posted to AFB’s blog, and I too was very dismayed. I have my own thoughts about what might have been the motivation behind the article, but I suppose I’ll keep them to myself. But needless to say I totally disagree. As someone who has been blind since birth and who now knows a great deal about what it means when something is inaccessible, it shocks me that anyone in this day and age would even fathom the idea that things should remain inaccessible. Let alone someone who themselves is blind thinking that! And yet some people still dare to dream that a lot of us don’t know what it means to be blind, that we can’t think for ourselves and have our own agendas. Come on–get real! People of color have for years had more rights than we do today. That’s all I will say.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Follow Us

  • Mastodon
  • Linked In

Recent blog articles

December Gift of Accessibility: Scribe for Meetings Free for All!

New Weekend Support Package for Remote Incident Manager. Available for $50 this weekend only!

Pneuma Solutions Is Going Global!

Bridging the Gap in AI: A Call for Inclusive Innovation

My Love Affair with Sous Vide Cooking: A Blind Cook’s Perspective

A Universal Remote for All Your Tech Needs: A User Perspective on Remote Incident Manager

Happy RIMiversary!

When The Silver Screen Meets Real Life: My Unforgettable Encounter with Tom Sullivan

The Country of the Blind: A Blind Man’s Praise

BlindShell Classic 2 Integrates Sero: A Leap Forward in Assistive Technology

Summer Shows for Us = Summer Savings for Everyone! 25% Off with Code show2023

Inclusive Design over Incidental Accessibility: Why Your Existing Remote Desktop Solution May Not Be Serving You as Well as You Think

Sero for Android Gets a Face Lift!

RIM It to Win It!

Inclusion and Resilience: A Glimpse into Cuba’s Programs for the Blind

Remote Incident Manager for macOS Officially Released!

Celebrating Global Accessibility Awareness Day: Affordable, Cross-Platform Remote Assistance for Everyone

Talking Pellet Grill Accessibility, as Heard on the Blind Grilling Experience Podcast

A Mammoth Milestone: 100 Mastodon Followers!

Raising Children with One Blind and One Sighted Parent

Pneuma Solutions Officially Joins the Fediverse!

Raising a Blind Child with Purpose

Fun with ChatGPT: Writing a story about aliens helping the blind community

New Ways to Pay as You Go with Remote Incident Manager

Remote Incident Manager Coming to the Mac Platform!

Finally! Holding Businesses Accountable

Remote Incident Manager vs the Other Players – Part 2: RIM vs. TeamViewer

Remote Incident Manager vs the Other Players – Part 1: RIM vs. JAWS Tandem and NVDA Remote

Guest Review of Remote Incident Manager (RIM) Version 3.0

Remote Incident Manager (RIM)

The Future of System Access

The End of an Era

Pneuma Solutions seeks experienced front-end web developer

Accessible Information vs the PDF: Are you breaking the law?

Scribe Enterprise: The Undisputed Best in Augmented Document Remediation

Copyright © Pneuma Solutions, LLC  •  Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Follow us at LinkedIn